« 02 aug 04 - POTD | Main | wrists »
Monday, August 02, 2004
Note to Nate
This is a note to nate from Six Feet Under:
Dood,
when you start taking instructions from your dead wife on your love life it's time to get help. I should've mentioned this when it began, but you know how it is, sometimes the dead have interesting shit to say and well, i kinda liked what she was saying. But, it's become increasingly clear that your dead fictional wife is giving you bad dead fictional advice and you need to draw the line somewhere man.
it aint cool.
That dead bitch is sitting there fuckin with your mellon man. She's pissed she be dead and you aint. Kick her corpse to the curb.
with love,
ruzz.
ps. I know she's your sister and all, but y0 claire is in the other room getting it on with mena suvari, and everyone knows i dont like lesbians, or mena, but shit. Someone needs to go tape that. We can sell it on the web and get stinkin rich. well, i mean, you can get stinkier and richer, I will just get stinky and rich.
pps. thinkaboutit.
Posted by ruzz on August 2, 2004 at 04:24 AM in ruthie asked, am i going to get broken? | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83421098b53ef00d83463404e69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Note to Nate:
Comments
Excuse me? You don't like lesbians? And Mena Suvari?! Come on - American Beauty.
Posted by: the Doc | Aug 2, 2004 10:46:31 AM
I like lesbians but they give me heartburn.
Posted by: Stephen | Aug 2, 2004 11:12:55 AM
i love lesbians, but when you can show a movie on a woan's cranium they need to be burned in the oven until they are ash. so down with mena (and american beauty is the most overrated film since the english patient).
but lauren ambrose is a goddess. and i'd lick clean her little red capped altar any old time.
Posted by: jude | Aug 2, 2004 1:38:25 PM
no rational, thinking, male would ever like lesbians. The argument that it's twice the women is ridiculous. It's twice the women that don't like cock.
further, something troubles me by men who get aroused by a scenario where they would never be invited, wanted, or needed.
and, as a male, who want's to be responsible (or at least permitted) for a woman's intense pleasure, it would be stupid of me to watch movies where no man is required.
Posted by: ruzz | Aug 2, 2004 2:23:13 PM
or you could just be a closet homosexual who secretly wants and needs cock so you need to have a man in your porn and your fantasies because your true pleasure comes from the cock rather than the pussy ;)
Posted by: jude | Aug 2, 2004 4:09:11 PM
now whos having a fantasy?
Posted by: ruzz | Aug 2, 2004 4:44:27 PM
Now, now, boys - I didn't mention anything about being sexually atracted to women because they're lesbians. If a woman is beautiful, it doesn't (necessarily) have anything to do with her sexual preference. Obviously it's better for the male libido and fantasy engine if a woman likes all my parts as much as I like hers, but she can still be an object of desire. I prefer to throw in with bisexual women as opposed to lesbians for the baser urges (if there's going to be vaginas outnumbering penises).
And overrated or not, I loved American Beauty. Lester rocks. And I thought Mena was a good choice (and she looked the part).
Posted by: the Doc | Aug 3, 2004 10:20:04 AM